中国啤酒行业报告:啤酒将比白酒更受青睐-China Liquor SectorFill more beer into the glass-58页
2019-08-23 热度 ★★★★ 瑞信
编者按:
Capacity closure is one of the most effective ways to improve margin and efficiencyconsidering a low utilisation rate in
在线阅读
内容预览
Capacity closure is one of the most effective ways to improve margin and efficiency considering a low utilisation rate in the China beer market. After a period of land grab through fast capacity expansion and M&As by leading players, we notice the industry's utilisation rate experienced a sharp decrease from 78% in 2013 to 63% in 2016, following a shrink in the overall industry volume. International beer companies such as ABInBev and Carlsberg have closed more than ten breweries in China since 2016. Later, more Chinese players started to join in, although the whole process was not easy.
■ CRB is the pioneer among domestic players. It closed 2/5/13 plants in 2016/17/18, respectively, and plans to close another 7-10 in 2019. After a series of shutdowns, the benefit is obvious with the utilisation rate and deprecation/PBT ratio improving to 53.7% and 48.8% in 2018, from 53.1% and 91.6% in 2015.
■ also has a clear path of capacity optimisation. The company shut down two plants located in Shanghai and Anhui in 2018 and plans to close at least 10 over the next five years (2-3 each year). As a result, its utilisation rate lift to 57% in 2018 (from 53.8% in 2017) and depreciation/PBT ratio lowered to 35.9% in 2018 (from 43.9% in 2017).
The market is concerned whether the rising malt cost will put a dampener on gross margin expansion considering the Australia barley price has been up 17% YoY in 1Q19. Webelieve this pressure is manageable for leading players thanks to their strong bargain power against suppliers, mix improvement and sufficient inventory (3-6 months). We did a sensitivity analysis of CRB and Tsingtao's gross margins, based on different assumptions of malt cost and ASP. Assuming malt cost up 15% and ASP grows 3-4%, our sensitivity analysis shows gross margin could improve to 36.3-36.9% from 35.7% for CRB and expand to 32.3-32.9% from 31.7% for Tsingtao in 2018, or 0.6-1.2 pp for both companies.
■ CRB is the pioneer among domestic players. It closed 2/5/13 plants in 2016/17/18, respectively, and plans to close another 7-10 in 2019. After a series of shutdowns, the benefit is obvious with the utilisation rate and deprecation/PBT ratio improving to 53.7% and 48.8% in 2018, from 53.1% and 91.6% in 2015.
■ also has a clear path of capacity optimisation. The company shut down two plants located in Shanghai and Anhui in 2018 and plans to close at least 10 over the next five years (2-3 each year). As a result, its utilisation rate lift to 57% in 2018 (from 53.8% in 2017) and depreciation/PBT ratio lowered to 35.9% in 2018 (from 43.9% in 2017).
The market is concerned whether the rising malt cost will put a dampener on gross margin expansion considering the Australia barley price has been up 17% YoY in 1Q19. Webelieve this pressure is manageable for leading players thanks to their strong bargain power against suppliers, mix improvement and sufficient inventory (3-6 months). We did a sensitivity analysis of CRB and Tsingtao's gross margins, based on different assumptions of malt cost and ASP. Assuming malt cost up 15% and ASP grows 3-4%, our sensitivity analysis shows gross margin could improve to 36.3-36.9% from 35.7% for CRB and expand to 32.3-32.9% from 31.7% for Tsingtao in 2018, or 0.6-1.2 pp for both companies.
完整内容请点击在线阅读,如需下载请升级为VIP会员。
最近访客
昊图食品网版权及免责声明:
凡本网注明“来源:昊图食品网”的所有作品,版权均属于昊图食品网,未经本网授权,任何单位及个人不得转载、摘编或以其它方式使用上述作品。已经本网授权使用作品的,应在授权范围内使用,并注明“来源:昊图食品网”。违反上述声明者,本网将追究其相关法律责任。
凡本网注明 “来源:XXX(非昊图食品网)” 的作品,均转载自其它媒体,转载目的在于传递更多信息,并不代表本网赞同其观点和对其真实性负责。如果涉及版权问题,请作者持权属证明与本网联系。